Špaňár: Health insurance companies cannot be the primary pillar of prevention. They don’t have the funds

Prevention has a 7 to 10 year effect, so it needs to be addressed as early as possible. However, health insurance companies should not be the primary pillar of this, nor do they have the money to do so. Michal Špaňár, CEO of the Union Health Insurance Company, said this during a panel discussion at the third annual conference of the Healthcare Daily “Economics of Prevention”. According to him, the insurance companies fulfil their obligations within the framework of secondary or tertiary prevention.

According to the head of the Union, prevention has three levels – primary, secondary and tertiary. Primary prevention, he said, is a broad area. “I agree that sports and education on healthy lifestyle is crucial in this regard. But health insurance is an afterthought in this regard. Health insurers should not be the primary pillar of prevention. They don’t even have the money for it and something would have to change,” Špaňár said at the conference.

Nevertheless, he said, insurance companies can do something. “Even though we have a limited budget for this, we have prepared a series of podcasts, for example. In them, problems are also discussed by experts from the perspective of prevention and we have extremely positive feedback,” he said, adding that the insurer also publishes information leaflets on prevention. He added that Slovakia and the Czech Republic would also benefit from teaching health literacy in schools.

The first panel of the third annual Health Economics of Prevention conference. In the foreground (from the left) Petr Neužil, head of the cardiology department at the Homolka Hospital, Marian Hajdúch, director of the Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine at the Faculty of Medicine of Palacký University in Olomouc, and Michal Špaňár, CEO of the Slovak Union Health Insurance Company, Ondřej Šebek, chairman of the Czech National Sports Agency, Ivo Hartmann, publisher of the Healthcare Daily and moderator of the discussion, Ales Rod, member of the Czech National Economic Council of the Government, and Petr Fifka, deputy chairman of the Health Committee in the Czech Parliament’s Chamber of Deputies.

Organised screening is less effective

As far as secondary prevention is concerned, insurance companies have a bigger role to play there, according to Špaňár. Union Insurance Company, as a subsidiary of a Dutch insurance company, has taken over several things from the Netherlands, according to him. For example, secondary prevention includes the provision of benefits with the condition of passing a preventive check-up, preventive screenings and so on.

“A popular benefit at Union is a dental allowance, which is conditional on passing a preventive dental check-up, as well as a preventive check-up with a general practitioner. As has become customary, when you target people’s most sensitive thing, which is the wallet, it works. The number of people having a preventive check-up has increased. People need to be motivated not only through health benefits but also through finances,” the Union chief said.

Michal Špaňár, CEO of the Union Health Insurance Company, during the third annual conference of the Healthcare Daily titled Economics of Prevention.

However, in his words, the practice in the insurance company has shown that the so-called organized screening is less effective than the classic invitation for a preventive check-up. In this respect, he said, the strategy still needs to be improved. “But in general, even an invitation to a preventive check-up should be set up in advance so that it is both cost-effective and efficient,” Špaňár said.

The response rate for preventive screening was 14 per cent for colon cancer, 18 per cent for cervical cancer and 11 per cent for breast cancer. Response rates were slightly higher for invitations to general preventive check-ups (26.50%), paediatric check-ups (75.1%), dental check-ups (48.7%) and gynaecological check-ups (40.7%).

The audience at the Healthcare Daily’s conference Economics of Prevention often engaged in discussions with interesting questions.

Telemedicine could be a help too

Insurance companies are also concerned with so-called tertiary prevention. This is an area that focuses on minimising pre-existing diagnoses. In this area, according to Špaňár, telemedicine and various remote monitoring can be particularly helpful. “These tools can bring a higher quality, but also a longer life expectancy. At the same time, they reduce the overall cost of financing healthcare. The problem is that telemedicine is not perceived as classical care delivery. Thus, it cannot be covered by public health insurance,” stressed the CEO of Union Health Insurance Company.

According to Union’s findings, remote monitoring in cardiovascular diseases, for example, can help improve a patient’s quality of life and prevent hospitalisation. In Slovakia, this is one of the diagnoses that are the most common cause of hospitalisation. “We manage to prevent complications by monitoring and inviting patients to the outpatient clinic early. However, in order to roll out these activities on a larger scale, telemedicine would have to be added to the list of healthcare providers,” he explained.

Mohlo by vás zajímat

Michal Špaňár, General Director of the Union Health Insurance Company.

The cost of general preventive check-ups is close to €50 million per year. There are also 1.2 million people with high blood pressure in Slovakia. Paradoxically, the number of visits to doctors in the country is quite high. According to statistics, it is 10.1 visits per person, which is a very high figure compared with other countries in the world.

Despite this, Slovakia registers 12 thousand preventable deaths a year. This is the sixth worst balance within the European Union countries. According to Špaňár, this is the tip of the iceberg of problems that could be prevented if prevention were more systematic. “Prevention brings an effect in a horizon of 7 to 10 years, so it needs to be addressed as soon as possible,” added the director of Union Insurance Company.

Miroslav Homola

Photo by Radek Čepelák

We would like to thank the General Health Insurance Company, National Sports Agency, RBP, Health Insurance Company of the Ministry of Interior of the Czech Republic, Military Health Insurance Company, EUC Medical Group and Sprinx for their support of the conference.

Ivo Hartmann, publisher of the Healthcare Daily, launches the 3rd International Conference on the Economics of Prevention.
Olympic hockey player Dominik Hašek (right) during a discussion with Slovak MP Richard Rashi.
On the right: goalkeeper of the Czech national football team and the American club New England Revolution Tomáš Vaclík, on the left: General Health Insurance Company of the Czech Republic deputy Ivan Duškov.
The second panel of the Economics of Prevention conference entitled Prevention of Health Risks – Theory versus Practice. From left: chairman of the Oncology Clinic of the 1st Faculty of Medicine of the Charles University in Prague Luboš Petruželka, deputy of the General Health Insurance Company of the Czech Republic for client services Ivan Duškov, football goalkeeper Tomáš Vaclík, Slovak Chief Hygienist Ján Mikas, president of the Polish Society for Public Health Andrzej Mariusz Fal, and director of SZÚ Barbora Macková.
Filip Krumphanzl